94 mustang gt 5 speed or 96 camaro z28 automatic?

-camaro has a 2800 stall. im going for 100% speedIs the camaro built? 2800 stall is over 1000rpm above stock, seems overkill for a stock setup.

Normally the camaro would eat the mustang up, but if you know how to shift, the mustang would be quicker. I don't have enough info about aftermarket stuff done to the cars. Bone stock or even equally modded, the camaro would go faster with equally skilled drivers. That is true for all mustang vs. camaros up until 2011 model years. (mustang fans, I know that the cobra is faster than any z28, and the roush and saleen models are no slouches either, I am talking about even up racers, mod for mod.)



Mustang For '94, the V-8 became more refined, to produce 215 horsepower at 4200 and 285 pound-feet of torque at 3500, meaning the engine had to rev a little higher than before to reach a lower peak, and the driver had to work harder for serious performance. The output change, saddled with the car's 200-pound weight increase, resulted in slightly softened acceleration. Its 0-60-mph performance of 6.7 seconds is still quick, but not as aggressive as before... 6.3 with the manual/5speed.



As for the camaro Z28: LT1 5.7 V8 275 bhp @ 5200 rpm, 325 lb-ft @ 2400 rpm.

0-60 in 6.1 automatic and 5.7 seconds, manual.



Speed, pick camaro, but the mustang is a fun car too. If the cars are not in tip top shape, don't rag em out, they are old now.... cars are cheap, fast, reliable....pick two.... :)
mustang gt all day! mine is a 95 with the 5.0 engine. iv beat 5 z28's. z28's will just fall part.
The mustang. The Z28 has and always will be unreliable.
Gt, 96 camaros were poorly made and you will be happier with the 5 speed for speed